Investigating the Challenges Faced by Semester Six Students in Learning English Syntax: A Case Study at Ibn Tofail University, Morocco
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61166/amd.v4i1.116Keywords:
English syntax learning, X-bar theory, Challenges in syntax education, Syntactic movement, Public UniversityAbstract
This study examines the challenges faced by sixth-semester students at Moroccan Public University in learning English syntax. Syntax, as a key area of linguistics, is crucial for understanding sentence structure and grammatical accuracy. Despite its importance, students often struggle due to the abstract concepts, specialized terminology, and fast instructional pace. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach with questionnaires and open-ended questions, the study involved 104 students from the English department . The findings reveal significant obstacles such as weak foundational knowledge, limited practical exercises, and the complexity of syntactic theories. In particular, mastering X-bar theory is challenging; common errors include confusing complements, adjuncts, and specifiers when assigning roles within the hierarchical tree structure. Additionally, students find it difficult to comprehend how auxiliaries move within the tree and how transformations like T-to-C movement function derivationally. The cognitive load increases as learners navigate layered projections (X, X′, XP) and distinguish between constituents, especially when movement disrupts the expected linear order. These results highlight the need for learner-centered teaching strategies that simplify and actively engage students with complex syntactic topics such as X-bar theory and syntactic movement, aiming to improve learning outcomes in syntax.
References
Ada, C., & Chukwuokoro, F. (2024). Teaching syntax in multilingual contexts: Challenges and innovations. Academic Press. No DOI available.
Ali, S. W. (2023). Syntactic tree diagram: Students' problems and the causes. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE), 5 (1), 68–76. https://journal.univetbantara.ac.id/index.php/ijelle/article/view/3717
Boukanouf, A., Biddou, N., & Al Ghadi, A. (2022). The challenges facing the teaching of English in Moroccan universities: Flaws in planning, failures in implementation. La Revue Marocaine de la Pensée Contemporaine, 10, 1–15.
No DOI available.
Chomsky, N., Jacobs, R. A., & Rosenbaum, P. S. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English transformational grammar (pp. 184–221). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867589-003
Culicover, P. W., Wasow, T., & Akmajian, A. (Eds.). (1977). Formal syntax. Academic Press. No DOI available.
Dharmawan, Y. Y. (2014, May). An analysis of traditional grammar, immediate constituent analysis, and X-bar syntax theory. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Language (ICEL), Vol. 2, pp. 1–7.
No DOI available.
Djalolovna, M. S. (2024). Grammatical features of the English language: Syntax and morphology. Web of Technology: Multidimensional Research Journal, 2 (9), 97–101. No DOI available.
Elimadi, I. (2024). Challenges of teaching English for specific purposes in Morocco. International Journal for Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization. https://hal.science/hal-04232353v1/document
El Khdrar, A. (2024). Understanding differentiated instruction (DI): Practices and challenges in the EFL classroom in Morocco. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 8 (8), 3122–3130. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8080229
Jackendoff, R. (1977). X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. MIT Press.
No DOI available.
Klaina, Mekki. (2024). Islamic Scientific Research: Its Importance in Serving Society and Mechanisms for its Integration, Al-Fadlan Journal of Islamic Education and Teaching, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 77-98. https://doi.org/10.61166/fadlan.v2i2.69
Kusumawardhani, P. (2017). The analysis of conjunctions in writing an English narrative composition: A syntax perspective. Wanastra: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 9 (1), 1–7. No DOI available.
Nugroho, A. (2016). Syntax: Theory and application in EFL classrooms. Graha Ilmu.
No DOI available.
Nuriyanti, I. (2022). A syntactical analysis error on students’ grammar through tree diagram. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 5 (5), 1047–1060. https://doi.org/10.36456/project.v5i5.3717
Radford, A. (1988/2009). Transformational grammar: A first course. Cambridge University Press.
Syarif, A. (2011). An analysis of students' errors in using adjective clauses. Unpublished manuscript.
Tahang, H. (2019). Barriers encountered by EFL students in learning syntax at fifth semester in English department of Sorong Muhammadiyah University. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 2 (1), 24–32. No DOI available.
Wang, Q. (2010). Drawing tree diagrams: Problems and suggestions. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1 (6), 926–934. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.6.926-934
Wei, Y., & Zhang, L. (2013). The survey on barriers of oral English learning for college students in China. English Language Teaching, 6 (6), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n6p68
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rachida M'chaar, Abderrazak El Kemma, Bendaoud Nadif

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




